Month: October 2014

Undead U. at Michigan Tech Thursday

image115351-horizDon’t be alarmed if you see zombies roaming the Michigan Technological University campus on Thursday night. They’re not looking for tricks or treats; they’re probably  attending Undead U: A Zombie Symposium.

Michigan Tech hosted the first Undead U symposium last year, and Undead U returns to campus on Thursday, Oct. 30, at 7:30 p.m. in Fisher Hall 139, featuring a lineup of actual zombie scholars from across the nation. Talks will touch on the history of zombie epidemics, why zombies in popular culture look the way they do and what it might be like to be a zombie.

The Meaning of Zombies

“We’re not just talking about pop-culture zombies,” says Syd Johnson, assistant professor of philosophy and bioethics and Undead U coordinator. “Zombies are everywhere these days for entertainment, but they’re also a really interesting way of contextualizing real-world concerns.”

Looking at zombies provides a new way to think about current events—like the recent Ebola outbreak, Johnson says.

“These things happen from time to time. Disease is frightening, but something people like, like zombies, makes for an interesting way to approach these topics. We’re bringing an infectious disease specialist as one of the guest speakers . . . a fascinating way to look at real-world issues.”

Each of the symposium’s four speakers will present for 20–30 minutes, with a question-and-answer session between each speaker.

“This event is really an informal, educational and fun way to learn more about ourselves,” says Johnson. “There are lots of important questions that come from thinking about the undead.”

Philosophical, ethical and scientific questions run amok when considering a world where the dead spring back to life.

Fear of the Undead

“Zombies are an example of a worst-case scenario,” says Johnson. “It taps into our fear of death, disease and contagion. Parts of it are make-believe, but other parts are very real.”
The lore and story of zombies make us think about our place in the world, our social connections, our own actions, she says.

“Confronting the undead reminds us that life is good. We’re okay because we’re not like that. Whatever else could happen to you in the course of your day, at least no one is trying to eat you.”

Undead U: A Zombie Symposium is free and open to the public. Participants are welcome to come in zombie garb; “just don’t bite anyone,” says Johnson.

Article by Danny Messinger first appeared in Michigan Tech News

Philosopher John Russon to Speak Here November 7

The Humanities Department’s Rhetoric, Theory and Culture 2014 Colloquium series is pleased to welcome John Russon, Presidential Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at the University of Guelph (Canada). Professor Russon’s talk is entitled “The Limits of Money: Phenomenological Reflections on Selfhood and Value.” It’s being held Friday, November 7, at 5 pm, in the Great Lakes Research Centre, Room 201 (refreshments will be available). All are welcome!

Professor Russon is the author of two books on Hegel: The Self and Its Body in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit (University of Toronto Press, 1997) and Reading Hegel’s Phenomenology (Indiana University Press, 2004). He is also the author of Human Experience: Philosophy, Neurosis and the Elements of Everyday Life (State University of New York Press, 2003), which was awarded the 2005 Broadview Press/Canadian Philosophical Association Book Prize. His most recent work is entitled Bearing Witness to Epiphany: Persons, Things and the Nature of Erotic Life (State University of New York Press, 2009).

Below is is the abstract for Professor Russon’s talk.

The Limits of Money: Phenomenological Reflections on Selfhood and Value

We are constitutively split between two different experiences.  In the experience of “intimacy,” the differentiation that we typically presume of self from other and of fact from value is not operative; such intimacy is distinctive of the formative experience of children.  This formative experience, however, precisely gives rise to the experience of “economy,” the experience, that is, of discrete subjects who work upon an alien world.  Our challenge is to live in a way that acknowledges both forms of experience without resorting to the authoritative terms of either.  Overall, I will argue that money, which is roughly the collectively recognized medium for recognizing the universality of exchange value, in principle misrepresents the lived nature of value.  Hence, the more money defines our frame of reference (“economy”), the more the non-universalizable values that are essential to our existence (“intimacy”) are effaced.